Key differences between IPC and CrPC

As citizens of India, it is important to be well versed with the laws of our country, more so, when it comes to society at large. The criminal laws impact not just individuals but the entire society. The Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) are two of the most important legislation governing crimes in India. Besides these, the Indian Evidence Act, 1872 is the third legislation under criminal law in India.

The Indian Penal Code (IPC)

The Indian Penal Code is the official criminal code of India, which was drafted way back in 1860. It’s objective is to provide a general penal code for the country. It has 511 sections across 23 chapters, providing the list of crimes along with their definitions and punishments. The IPC has been amended several times and is now supplemented by other Acts. Its jurisdiction extends to the whole of India except the State of Jammu and Kashmir.

Here is the detailed overview of the important provisions of the CrPC –

• Chapter 1 – Introduction (Section 1 – 5)
• Chapter 2 – General Explanations (Section 6 – 52A)
• Chapter 3 – Of punishments (Section 53 -75)
• Chapter 4 – General Exceptions (Section 76 – 106)
• Chapter 5 – Of Abetment (Section 107 – 120)
• Chapter 5A – Of Criminal Conspiracy (Section 120A and 120B)
• Chapter 6 – Of offenses against the State (Section 121 – 130)
• Chapter 7 – Of offences relating to the army, navy and air force (Section 131 – 140)
• Chapter 8 – Of offences against the public tranquillity (Section 141 – 160)
• Chapter 9A – Of offences relating to elections (Section 171A – Section 171I)
• Chapter 10 – Of contempts of the lawful authority of public servants (Section 172 – 190)
• Chapter 11 – Of false evidence and offences against public justice (Section 191 – 229)
• Chapter 12 – Of offences relating to coin and government stamps (Section 230 – 263A)
• Chapter 13 – Of offences relating To weights and measures (Section 264 – 267)
• Chapter 14 – Of Offences Affecting The Public Health, Safety, Convenience, Decency And Morals (Section 268 – 294A)
• Chapter 15 – Of Offences Relating To Religion (Section 295 – 298)
• Chapter 16 – Of Offences Affecting The Human Body (Section 299 – 377)
• Chapter 17 – Of Offences Against Property (Section 378 – 462)
• Chapter 18 – Of Offences Relating To Documents And To Property Marks (Section 463 – 489E)
• Chapter 19 – Of The Criminal Breach Of Contracts Of Service (Section 490 – 492)
• Chapter 20 – Of Offences Relating To Marriage (Section 493 – 498)
• Chapter 20A – Of Cruelty By Husband Or Relatives Of Husband (Section 498A)
• Chapter 21 – Of Defamation (Section 499 – 502)
• Chapter 22 – Of Criminal Intimidation, Insult And Annoyance (Section 503 – 510)
• Chapter 23 – Of Attempts To Commit Offences (Section 511)

The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) –

The Code of Criminal Procedure is the main legislation on the procedure for the regulation of criminal law in India. The CrPC details the procedure for the investigation of the crime, presenting criminals before the court of law, collection of evidence, determination of guilt or innocence of the accused, imposition of penalties or punishments etc. It further lays down the hierarchy of the courts competent to try criminal lawsuits. In descending order it is the High Court at the top followed by Sessions Court, First Class Judicial Magistrate, Second Class Judicial Magistrate and Executive Magistrate. There is a limit affixed for sentences which these courts can pass against the accused. The Supreme Court is the apex court, and it has the ultimate power. The code was enacted in 1973. At present, the CrPC contains 484 sections cut across 37 chapters. It also has two schedules and 56 forms.

Here is the detailed overview of the important provisions of the CrPC –

• Chapter 1 – Preliminary (Section 1 – 5)
• Chapter 2 – Constitution of Criminal Courts and Offices (Section 6 – 25)
• Chapter 3 – Power of Courts (Section 26 – 35)
• Chapter 4 – Powers of Superior Officers of Police (Section 36 – 40)
• Chapter 5 – Arrest of Persons (Section 41 – 60)
• Chapter 6 – Processes to compel Appearance (Section 61 – 90)
• Chapter 13 – Jurisdiction of the Criminal Courts in inquiries and trials (Section 177 – 189)
• Chapter 14 – Conditions requisite for initiation of proceeding (Section 190 – 199)
• Chapter 15 – Complaints to Magistrates (Section 200 – 203)
• Chapter 16 – Commencement of proceedings before magistrates (Section 204 – 210)
• Chapter 17 – The Charge (Section 211 – 224)
• Chapter 18 – Trail before a court of session (Section 225 -237)
• Chapter 19 – Trial of warrant-cases by magistrates (Section 238 – 250)
• Chapter 20 – Trial of summons-cases by magistrates (Section 251 – 259)
• Chapter 21 – Summary Trials (Section 260 – 265)
• Chapter 22 – Attendance of persons confined or detained in prisons (Section 266 – 271)
• Chapter 23 – Evidence in inquiries and trials (Section 272 – 299)
• Chapter 24 – General provisions as to inquiries and trials (Section 300 – 327)
• Chapter 25 – Provisions as to accused persons of unsound mind (Section 328 – 339)
• Chapter 26 – Provisions as to offences affecting the administration of justice ( Section 340 – 352)
• Chapter 27 – The Judgement (Section 353 – 365)
• Chapter 28 – Submission of death sentences for confirmation (Section 366 – 371)
• Chapter 29 – Appeals (Section 372 – 394)
• Chapter 30 – Reference and Revision (Section 395 – 405)
• Chapter 31 – Transfer of criminal cases (Section 406 – 412)
• Chapter 32 – Execution, Suspension, Remission and Commutation of Sentences (Section 413 – 435)
• Chapter 33 – Provisions as to bail and bonds (Section 436 – 450)
• Chapter 34 – Disposal of Property (Section 451 – 459)
• Chapter 35 – Irregular Proceedings (Section 460 – 466)
• Chapter 36 – Limitation for taking cognizance of certain offences (Section 467 – 473)
• Chapter 37 – Miscellaneous (Section 474 – 484)

Major Difference between IPC and CrPC –

1.  The IPC provides a substantive list of all crimes and lays down the punishment for each one of them. For example, Section 378 defines Theft as “Whoever, intending to take dishonestly any moveable property out of the possession of any person without that per­son’s consent, moves that property in order to such taking, is said to commit theft.” The punishment for the offence of theft is spelt out under Section 379 in the following words, “Whoever commits theft shall be pun­ished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both.” On the other hand, CrPC is a procedural law, and it lays down the ways or methods to be followed in a criminal case. So if a person is charged with ‘theft’, it is the CrPC which provides further details as to how the investigation would be carried out, how evidence will be collected etc. So CrPC concerns itself with the procedural aspect of the crime.
2. The primary purpose of IPC is to provide a general penal code for India which prescribes punishments to wrong-doers. The primary goal of CrPC is to consolidate the criminal law in the country.
3. The Indian Penal Code is a substantive law whereas, the Code of Criminal Procedure is procedural law.

CONCLUSION –

The Indian Penal Code, Code of Criminal Procedure and the Indian Evidence Act are the three primary legislation governing criminal law in India. They continue to play an important role in the court of law for the effective administration of justice. Besides, there are other legislations such as the Prohibition of Child Trafficking Act, the Juvenile Justice Act, which supplement the three main legislation. Both the IPC and the CrPC are pan-India in nature and extend to the whole of the State. Jammu and Kashmir are beyond their jurisdiction. IPC is the only substantive law here, and the Indian Evidence Act and the CrPC are the procedural laws.

How to file a case on instances of sexual harassment at workplace

Sexual harassment in the workplace is one of the biggest problems which has started to increase as the corporate culture has begun to flourish. Anyone can be a harasser, and anyone can be a victim. It is insignificant as to who commits the offense. It could be a manager, co-worker, or even a non-employee like a client, contractor, or vendor. If the person’s conduct creates a hostile work environment or interrupts an employee’s success, is considered sexually harassing. An act which may amount to sexual harassment may vary from a sexually colored involuntary encounter with a senior employee of colleague, winking, whistling inappropriate touch or similar behavior. An act of a senior employee asking for a non-consented sexual favor from the junior employee, in lieu of promotion in the job, falls in the category of sexual harassment at the workplace.

To govern such actions and create a healthy working environment for women, Supreme Court of India, in the landmark case of Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan to fill the legislative vacuum laid down Vishaka Guidelines for the protection of women from sexual harassment at workplace. Later an act was passed by the legislature named, Protection of Women from Sexual harassment at Workplace (Prevention, Prohibition and Redressal) Act, 2013.

As per the rules governing sexual harassment at workplace, it is compulsory for all organizations with 10 or more workers to constitute an Internal Complaints Committee (ICC) for registration of complaints relating to sexual harassment and take action against the guilty employer or employee. Constitution of ICC is a legal right, and in case the workplace is refusing to constitute the same, they can be legally penalized.

The constituted ICC can file a complaint against the incident of sexual harassment at your workplace. A complaint must constitute the following details.

1. Name of the person by whom the complaint is filed.
2. The date on which the incident of sexual harassment took place
3. The time when the incident happened
4. Description of the incident or inappropriate behavior
5. Name of the person accused of sexual harassment
6. Working relationship between the victim and accused.

The complaint with the details mentioned above must be filed within three months of sexual harassment incident, with full confidentiality and speedy process. This sexual harassment complaint can be filed by anyone irrespective of gender. Lodging of an internal complaint with the ICC does not cease the right of the victim to lodge a criminal complaint against the colleague or employer. Reply to the complaint must be filed by the accused within ten days. An inquiry has to be completed within 90 days. The final report generated thereof must be submitted to the Employer or District officer within ten days. The Employer or the District Office has to act on recommendations within 60 days. In addition to this, if the victim or accused is not satisfied with the recommendations of the ICC or LCC (Local Compliant Committee), a further appeal can be filed before a tribunal or a court.

In the case of  Apparel Export Promotion Council vs A.K. Chopra placed before the SC of India, Accused mentioned that the penalty on him was harsh and disproportionate to the charge leveled against him. It was concluded by the research that the accused had not actually molested the victim, but had only tried to assault her and had not made any physical contact with her. On this, the Staff Committee observed that no lenient view would be justified in a case of molestation of a woman employee when the charge was fully proved. Any sympathetic action in such a situation would have a demoralizing effect on working women. One of the judges from the bench, in this case, remarked that they would not wait for a girl to be raped and then the charges of sexual harassment could be logged. Hence the charges levied on the accused are reasonable and not disproportionate.

Apart from the complaint mechanism, the employer can take another recourse such as Criminal proceedings and Disciplinary action.

Know More:  Sexual Harassment at Workplace

Under Criminal proceedings, as per Vishakha Guidelines, when the conduct of accused amount to a specific offense under IPC or any other law, the employer shall initiate appropriate actions in accordance with the law. Attention must be paid to ensure that victim or witnesses are not victimized or discriminated against while dealing with the complaints of sexual harassment. Following are the specific provisions of Indian Penal Code, that can be applied in a sexual harassment case thereby making it a criminal complaint.

Section 294, talks about the obscene act in public place.

Section 354, embodies the provision when whosever assaults or uses criminal force on any women, intending to outrage her modesty.

Section 509 holds that whosoever intending to insult the modesty of women, utters any word, makes any sound or gesture or exhibits any object or intrudes upon the privacy of such women. The same shall be punished with simple imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both.

In addition to the aforementioned recourses, when such conduct amounts to misconduct in employment as defined by the relevant service rules, appropriate disciplinary action must be initiated by the employer in accordance with the rules.

A civil suit can be filed for damages under tort laws. That is, the basis for filing the case would be mental anguish, physical harassment, loss of income and employment caused by sexual harassment.

7 Things That You Never Expect On History Of The Court Fees Act, 1870

History of the Court Fees Act, 1870 –

The Courts are institutions where the aggrieved go to seek justice. With the establishment of Courts in India, a system evolved for the payment of fees for the adjudication of cases. The rates of stamp fees leviable in courts and offices established beyond the local jurisdiction of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Judicature at Fort William in Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay and in proceedings on the appellate jurisdiction of High Courts were governed by the Act XXVI of 1867. However, within a span of about two years, it was considered necessary to make a general reduction in the rates on the institution of civil suits and to rely on the principle of maximum fee which was obtained under the previous law. Also, in order to rectify the repressive effect and to avoid future confusion between stamp-revenue proper and the revenue derived, a comprehensive bill known as the Court Fees Bill was introduced in the Legislature. Now it is known as the Court Fees Act, 1870. 

The Court Fees Act, 1870 –

The Act extends to the whole of India except the territories comprised in Part B states before the 1st of November, 1956. The Act came into force on 1st April 1970. It contains 6 chapters, 37 sections, and 3 schedules.

Types of Court Fees –

There are two kinds of court fees under the Court Fees Act –

• Ad Valorem Court fees (Schedule 1) – it means according to the valuation. Ad valorem duties are always estimated at a certain percent, on the valuation of the property as opposed to fixed or specific duties.
• Fixed or specific court fees (Schedule 2).

Computation of Court Fees –

Section 7 of the Act contemplates three types of valuation of the subject-matter of a suit.

• By valuing it according to its market value.
• By ascribing to the subject-matter an artificial value based simply on the certain fixed rule of calculation.
• By requiring the plaintiff himself to value the relief he seeks.

This section only applies where the ad valorem fee is payable.

Here is the detailed breakdown of the rule of computation of court fees in these kinds of suits –

• Suits for money – According to the amount claimed.
• Suits of maintenance and annuities or other sums payable periodically – Ten times the amount claimed to be payable in a year.
• Suits for movable property where the subject matter has a market value – According to the market value at the date of presenting the plaint.
• Suits for the possession of land, buildings or gardens – According to market value or (net profit x 15 times), whichever is higher.
• Suits for Pre-emption – If instituted under Muslim Personal Law, then according to the market value of the land.
• Suits for partition – According to the market value of the share in respect of which the suit has been instituted.
• Suits for the interest of an assignee of land revenue – Fifteen times of net profit.
• Suits to set aside an attachment of land – According to the amount for which the land was attached.
• Suits to redeem mortgaged property and suit for foreclosing – According to the principal money
• Suits for injunction or for a right to some benefit to arising out of the land – In such suits, the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought.

Section 35 of the Court Fees Act –

The 1[Appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 2[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act annexed,—The 2[Appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 3[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act annexed,” and may in like manner cancel or vary such order.

The Section states that the appropriate government, whether Central Government or respective State Governments from time to him, has the authority to reduce or remit fees as mentioned in the First and Second Schedules of the Act. It may in like manner also cancel or vary such an order.

CONCLUSION –

The Court Fees Act is a fiscal enactment. Its primary objective is to shield or protect the revenue of the State. It was passed to secure the revenue for the benefit of the State. Court Fee is considered as a State debt. The government has an obligation to pay court fees as much as any other party who approaches the court of law. This act also determines the jurisdiction of civil courts.

It is not mandatory for the court-fee value and the jurisdictional value to be the same. The right procedure is to ascertain the value for court fees at first and then adopt the same valuation for the jurisdiction.

Original blog is published at Legodesk for all your legal quires you could get instant support and help online.

Legodesk makes your legitimate practice increasingly proficient. You can deal with your cases, store significant archives, plan assignments, team up and substantially more to serve your customers.

Do you know why Lawyers Wear Black Coat??

Why do Lawyers Wear Black and white Uniform?

Every profession has a certain dress code, and the people belong to a particular profession are recognized by their attire.  Such as Doctors are recognized by their white aprons, engineers by their helmets and so on. In this way, lawyers are identified by their black and white attire. Though the color of lawyer’s attire is the same lawyers have a dress code that differs from country to country.  It is considered that lawyers have one of the most elegant dress code compared to other professions. Lawyers are considered as one of the best-dressed professionals. Whereas in some countries like Canada the uniform for lawyers is a red and white dress.  But in most of the countries, the dress code is white and black. In some European countries, the lawyer uses a traditional black-winged jacket over their dress. In countries like India, both men and women lawyer follow this dress code. Most of the lawyer across the globe wear formal wear in white and black combination.

A white shirt and black trousers and a coat with a white neckband are common attire for lawyers. We often wonder about the logic behind the black and white dress code. There is a reason behind it, we will discuss it in the following article.

The history of the black coat dates back to the 17th century

The origin of the black and white dress code lies in the 17th century. The black and white color is not chosen randomly. There is a valid logic behind the black and white color code for the lawyers. In February of 1685, King Charles II died. People began wearing a black and white gown to offer to mourn his death. From that time this uniform for lawyers is designed. If we see the previous pictures, we can find people used to wear a wig and a gown that was to award a degree of anonymity to lawyers and judges.  We can find that attire in old photos. Since that time the white and black dress has become an official dress code for the lawyers.

Why Black and White Color ??

There is a reason behind this too. Choosing a black color for the lawyer’s uniform has two reasons. First of all, in the old times, there was no availability of dyes in the large quantity. The purple color was signified to royalty, so the only fabric color left was black. This was the reason why black was an obvious choice. Another reason behind this is black is considered a color of authority and dominance. A person in a black coat looks more powerful and impactful. Also black color represents submission to a certain thing. As priests wear a black coat to show their submission to God, lawyers wear the black outfit to show their submission to justice. Black is a prominent color that offers sheer elegance. It is observed that people wearing black outfits look more impactful and elegant.

Lawyers wearing a black coat look extremely elegant and powerful.  

The other color white is chosen for its pure feel. The white color signifies goodness, innocence, and purity. In every legal battle, a lawyer is the only hope of justice for every individual. This color of hope is chosen to make individuals believe in the judicial system. In Indian judicial system wearing a black coat or robe over a white shirt and a white neck, the band is mandatory as this system is influenced by British rulers. There is an /advocate’s Act of 1961 which states every lawyer should wear a black robe or coat with a white shirt and a white neckband.

Why a white neckband? Is there any specific reason?

In countries like India, not only a black coat and a white shirt symbolizes an advocate but a small neckband makes a lawyer recognizable. Every lawyer in the judicial system wears a white neckband. The white neckband is reserved only for the lawyers. So what makes it so important to use a white neckband?

The white neckband on the layer’s shirt also has its origin in England. In the old courts of England, the barristers used to wear these as a part of their uniform. This style was adopted by the Indian lawyers as the Indian judicial system is influenced by the British judicial system. A lawyer’s neckband is a white piece of cloth where two white cloth bands are joined together. These two bands represent the tablet of law and tablets of stone.  This is designed according to Christian belief. These were used by Moses that inscribed ten commandments that are adapted from a burning bush on Mt. Sinai. The neckband is considered as the first example of a uniform code law. The shape of a lawyer’s white neckband represents the laws of God and men

Wearing appropriate clothes in a courtroom is extremely important. The judicial system is considered as one of the most respectable system so showing respect to the system and the people involved in the system gets essential. In almost every country except the USA, it is extremely important to follow a particular dress code in a courtroom.  In USA participants in the civil proceeding have a lot of flexibility in their dressing. Even though there is not the freedom to dress up as you want. The most important thing to note is the judges in the courtroom can throw you out of the courtroom if you dress up inappropriately. This is the reason why not only lawyers but every individual who participates in the court should follow a certain dress code. The basic rule for dressing is to dress up conservatively. Wearing casual and shabby clothes in the courtroom is considered as disrespect to the law.

Depending on the reason why you are summoned to court a solid black or navy suit with a formal white shirt and a tie will pass through any judge’s standards. A negative dress up will leave an impact on what the juries think about you. 

This blog was originally shared at Legodesk