Ten Difficult Things About Voluntary Causing Hurt : Provision And Punishment

With all the progress we have made as a nation, there is also a big number of crimes happening around us in recent days. And women and children are becoming more part to such kind of crimes, and hence it is essential to be aware of the offenses or wrong which are known as voluntarily causing hurt to someone or anyone and the punishment prescribed for it in the  Indian Penal Code, 1860.

Section 323 of IPC

Section 323 is an essential part mentioned under the chapter 16th of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, titled “Offenses related to the Affecting Human Body.” Section 323 basically deals with the punishment clause for voluntary causing hurt. But before going further first, we need to understand the meaning of some technical terms, like “Hurt (defined under section 319)”, “Grievous Hurt (defined under section 320)”,  “Voluntary causing Hurt (defined under section 321)” and “Voluntary causing Grievous Hurt (which is defined under section 322)”. So basically the present article only has a relation with Section 323 read with section 321, which defines what actually “voluntary causing Hurt” mean. Though we have to discuss only the provision related to section 323, we also need to understand under this, that there is segregation of some technical terms which mentioned above and it is essential to discuss under this.

“Hurt (which is defined under section 319) ” meaning simply that any person who causes bodily pain, disease or infirmity to any other person and if the same does happen where knowledge plays an essential role is to be understood within the meaning of “Voluntary causing Hurt (under section 321)”

“Grievous Hurt (which is defined under section 320)” is to be understood as an extended form of Hurt. Under this, there are some different kind of hurt only, which is designated as “grievous” in nature. They are,

Emasculation,

Permanent privation of the sight of any of the Eye or Ear or Permanent disfigured the face or head,

Privation of any member or joint or permanent impairing of the powers of any joint,

Fracture or Dislocation of bone or tooth

or any other type of Hurt which may endanger life or which the sufferer causes severely bodily pain up to 20 days or more or may not be able to follow their ordinary pursuits.

So basically, there are eight important types of hurt which are grievous in nature and on another aspect where knowledge gets involves in any of the hurt which is grievous in nature may amount to be “voluntary causing Grievous Hurt (under section 322).

Read Also: Key differences between IPC and CrPC

Section 323 Of Indian Penal Code 

The definition of the provision “voluntary causing hurt” defined under section 321 and their punishment clause in section 323 of the penal code 1862.  Section 321 states that if a person with pure intention is causing Hurt to any other person. And there exists a piece of knowledge that their action may likely cause hurt to another is “Voluntary Causing Hurt.”

Section 323 defines the punishment for the wrong defines under section 321, states that whoever does the same shall be punished with the 1-year imprisonment or fine of 1000 rs.  or both. Also, if a person without any intention has a knowledge that particular action may likely to cause hurt or gives to another person a “voluntary causing hurt” on the grave and sudden provocation (defined under section 334), then, he or she shall be not prosecuted under section 323, there should be applied some facts for exemption under section 323, as follows:-

1. Firstly, there was no sudden or grave provocation exist,
2. Secondly, the offender had the intention of causing hurt;
3. Thirdly, the offender had clear knowledge that his conduct will cause hurt to the other people
4. Lastly, the offender caused any bodily hurt.

So if any of the facts may going to apply, the accused punishment shifted from section 323 to section 334, and under this, the accused shall be punished with the imprisonment for a maximum of 1 month or a fine which exceed up to 500 or with both.

The offense under section 323 of the Indian Penal Code, 1862 is Non- cognizable, Bailable and Triable by any Magistrate Also, Compounded by the person to whom the hurt is caused.

Voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons

 Section 324 of the Indian Penal Code further clarifies the repercussions of “voluntarily causing hurt using any dangerous weapon or instruments” such as shooting, stabbing, or cutting or any other tool which is likely to cause death and the accused has the knowledge of the same, are much severe. Some examples- fire, heated substance, poison, an explosive substance, or any substance which might be dangerous to the human body in the form of consumption.

Punishment– up to 3 years or fine or Both

Voluntarily causing hurt to extort property or to do an illegal act forcefully 

Section 327 of the Indian Penal Code, deals with the offense of “voluntarily causing hurt with the motive or intention to extort the property from the sufferer or any other person” interested in the victim. This may also include constraining the sufferer or any other person interested in the victim to make them do act illegally directly has relation to the commission of the offense.  The said offense is categorized under the meaning of “grave” in nature.

Punishment: – up to 10 years only or with the fine.

Voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from their duty

Section 332 of the India Penal Code defines that Any person, who deliberately causes hurt to any public servant in discharge of his duty or causing hurt with the intention of deterring him from discharging his duty is not acceptable by law and amount to some punishment.

Punishment: – up to 3 years only or with the fine.

Voluntarily causing hurt in committing robbery

Robbery (defined under section 390 of the penal code) is considered as a serious crime, and that is why Section 394 of the Indian Penal Code deals with such kind of cases where the voluntary hurt was caused during the conduction (include attempt also) of the crime of robbery. The offender or any person (involvement is necessary, directly or indirectly) jointly responsible for such offense of robbery,

Punishment: – Lifetime Imprisonment or Rigorous Imprisonment up to 10 years, sometimes fine may be included along with the punishment.

Ten Little Tricks To Know About Interlocutory Application In India And Its Format

Interlocutory is a legal term which essentially refers to an order, sentence, decree, or judgment, given in an intermediate or transitional stage between the beginning and end of a cause of action, used to give an impermanent or temporary decision on an issue. Along these lines, an interlocutory order isn’t final and isn’t liable to immediate appeal.

What is the interlocutory application

An interlocutory application meaning is an application which is moved in the primary appeal. It is normally documented when you request some urgent relief or to convey certain new facts to the learning of the court. In the event that the supreme court order says ‘interlocutory application disposed of”, it implies that you had documented an application looking for some relief, and in the wake of hearing you on the application, the court has passed an order in your application.

Interlocutory Petition mentioned in the Civil Rules of Practice, Rule 2 (j) states ” application to the court for any suit, appeal or proceedings already instituted in such court, other than a proceeding for execution of a decree or order.” It is fascinating to take note of that “application” is characterized in Rule 2 (c) that incorporates execution application, execution petition, and interlocutory application, both written and oral.

Interlocutory Application Format:-

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION

BEFORE THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR ELECTRICITY

IA NO. ______OF 200

In

Appeal/Original Petition No. ________of 200 .

CAUSE TITLE

Set out the Appeal No. _________________of 200

Appeal / Petition short cause title

Set out the 1. Appeal No.____________200

Cause Title – Interlocutory Application

Petition for stay/direction/dispense with/condone delay/calling records

The applicant above-named state/s as follows :

1. Set out the relief (s)

2. Brief facts

3. The basis on which interim orders prayed for

4. The balance of convenience, if any :

(All interlocutory applications shall be supported by an affidavit sworn by the Applicant/on its behalf and attested by a Notary Public).

DECLARATION

The applicant above named hereby solemnly declare that nothing material has been concealed or suppressed and further declare that the enclosures and typed set of material papers relied upon and filed herewith are true copies of the originals or fair reproduction of the originals or true translation thereof.

Verified at_________dated at _______this day __________of _______200 .

Counsel for Applicant                                                                                                                                                                                                        Applicant

VERIFICATION

I __________________(Name of the applicant) S/o.W/o.D/o. (indicate any one, as the case may be ) ___________age ____________working as __________ in the office of _______________resident of _______________ do hereby verify that the contents of the paras _____________to ___________are true to my personal knowledge / derived from official record ) and para _________ to _______are believed to be true on legal advice and that I have not suppressed any material facts.

Date :

Place :

                                                                                                                                                     Signature of the Appellant/Petitioner or authorized officer

The Code of Civil Procedure with its Rule 3(9) defines an Original Petition as a petition by which procedures are founded in a court other than a suit or appeal or proceeding in the execution of a decree or order.

This elucidates and clarifies the distinction between an original appeal to and an Interlocutory order as

• The original appeal of is identified with the purpose of the start of a dispute while the interlocutory request is recorded within the main appeal.
• The original petition establishes the procedures while the interlocutory petition looks for interim relief.
• Interlocutory petitions can be named as a type of incidental procedures dissimilar to original appeal to and are recorded to support the principle/main petitions.
• Interlocutory petitions look for relief amid the pendency of the main appeal to and can be discarded before the final judgment.

In T.V. Satyanarayana v. Subba Aruna Meenakshi, the question into thought was whether an appeal lies against the order made by the family court on an application exhibited under section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act allowing interim maintenance under Section 19 of the Family Courts Act? It was held that  Interlocutory Application “means an application to the Court for any suit, appeal or proceeding already instituted in such Court other than an application for execution of the decree or setting aside the decree or last order made in such suit, appeal or proceeding.” An application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act squarely falls inside the significance of the words “Interlocutory Application,” as it could be made just in the primary proceeding under either provision of the Hindu Marriage Act. Any order passed on such an application would unquestionably be an interlocutory request.

The Supreme Court while thinking about the maintainability of appeals against judgment and interlocutory orders, considered a progression of decisions of various Courts rendered regarding the matter, held that each interlocutory order can’t be viewed as a judgment yet just those orders would be judgments which decide matter in hand or influence indispensable and important rights of the parties and which work on the serious injustice to the party concerned.

An Interlocutory Petition begins with a point of view to shield the finishes of equity from being vanquished when the Original Petition can’t address the prompt conditions. Interlocutory Applications or Interlocutory Petitions are recorded to help the primary appeal for an interlocutory alleviation in the midst of pendency of the main Petition. The purpose of this article is to mostly feature the interlocutory applications and different case laws to imply the statement.

Original blog is published at Legodesk for all your legal quires you could get instant support and help online.

Legodesk makes your legitimate practice increasingly proficient. You can deal with your cases, store significant archives, plan assignments, team up and substantially more to serve your customers.

The Truth About CPC – Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 Is About To Be Revealed.

Code Of Civil Procedure 1908’s Historical Background

Till 1859, in India, there was no uniform systematized law for the procedures to be followed in Civil Courts. In those past times, under the British standard, there were Crown Courts in Presidency towns and Provincial Courts in Mofussils.

• These Courts in Mofussil regions and Presidency towns were administered by various frameworks of Civil procedure through different guidelines, directions and special acts and those were changed on time to time premise based on conditions and needs.
• In 1859, a uniform civil procedure code was presented by passing the Civil Procedure Code (Act VII of 1859). Be that as it may, this code couldn’t fill the need as this code was not made relevant to the Supreme Courts (Crown Courts under the Royal Charter) and the Sadar Diwani Adalats (Principal Courts under the Judicial Plan by the Governor-General).
• In 1861, the Indian High Courts Act was passed and the Supreme Courts and Sadar Diwani Adalats were abolished. Then the High Courts were set up by supplanting the Supreme Courts at Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta. At that point, the Civil Procedure Code 1859 made relevant to these recently established High Courts.
• The Code of 1859 was altered consistently every once in a while and was supplanted by passing the Civil Procedure Code, 1877. This code of 1877 was revised in 1878 and 1879 and the third civil procedure Code was established in 1882, which supplanted the past code. The Code of Civil Procedure 1882 was additionally revised a few times and eventually the present code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was passed eclipsing the deformities of the Code of 1882.

a) Civil Procedure Court: Meaning and Object

The Law identifying with the practices and system to be followed in the Civil Courts is directed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The word CODE signifies ‘a systematic collection of statutes, a body of laws so arranged as to avoid inconsistency and overlapping‘.

The fundamental object of this civil procedure code is to unite and alter the laws identifying with the technique and practices followed in the Civil Courts in India. All things considered, it was cherished in the preamble of the code that it was instituted to combine and revise the laws identifying with the methodology to be followed in the civil courts having civil jurisdiction in India. The Civil Procedure Code directs each activity in civil courts and the gatherings previously it till the execution of the degree and order.

Read Also: Understanding the Civil Laws in India

The Aim of the Procedural law is to execute the standards of Substantive law. This Code guarantees fair justice by upholding the rights and liabilities.

b) Extent and Application

The Civil Procedure Code was passed in 1908 and came into power from first January 1909. The Code is pertinent to the entire nation with the exception of –
The State of Jammu and Kashmir
The state of Nagaland and the tribal regions

There is additionally a provision that the concerned state governments may make the provisions of this code pertinent to the entire or part of the State of Nagaland or such tribal regions by notification in the official gazette.

This code is pertinent in the scheduled zones of the previous State of Madras (Lakshadweep), the East Godavari, West Godavari and Visakhapatnam agencies (Now in Andhra Pradesh State).

Read Also: Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Overview of the Bare Act

Salient Features

• The Civil Procedure Code made the procedure to be followed in the Civil Courts very basic and compelling. Authorization of rights, liabilities, and commitments of the citizens are managed by this code. To state, as such, the Civil Procedure Code gives the component to the implementation of rights and liabilities.
• The Civil Procedure Code is a general law and won’t influence any laws which are as of now in force. If there should arise an occurrence of any contention with any other laws, the other law will prevail in the Civil Procedure Code. On the off chance that, in the event that the other law is quiet about a specific issue, the Civil Procedure Code will apply.
• The Civil Procedure Code has been amended a few times to address the issues and prerequisites which are dynamic and changing every once in a while. Between 1909 to 1976, the Code has been amended for more than 30 times.

Conclusion

To empower the courts to convey fair-minded and unprejudiced equity, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 gives straightforward and clear procedures to be trailed by the Civil Courts. If there should be an occurrence of no provisions identifying with some issue or matter, the court won’t most likely decide effectively.

Consequently the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 consolidated the provisions for inherent powers. At the point when there is no enactment, the court, in light of a legitimate concern for equity may exercise the discretionary power by acting past the powers given to them under the Code of Civil Procedure. It is known as the Inherent powers of the Court.

The Code of Civil Procedure is one of the vital parts of procedural laws and it is the one regulating the method to be trailed by the Civil Courts in India. Despite the fact that it might have a few restrictions, however, it is as yet effective, basic, clear and empowers the courts to deliver fair-minded equity and impartial justice.

Original blog is published at Legodesk for all your legal quires you could get instant support and help online.

Legodesk makes your legitimate practice increasingly proficient. You can deal with your cases, store significant archives, plan assignments, team up and substantially more to serve your customers.

7 Things That You Never Expect On History Of The Court Fees Act, 1870

History of the Court Fees Act, 1870 –

The Courts are institutions where the aggrieved go to seek justice. With the establishment of Courts in India, a system evolved for the payment of fees for the adjudication of cases. The rates of stamp fees leviable in courts and offices established beyond the local jurisdiction of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Judicature at Fort William in Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay and in proceedings on the appellate jurisdiction of High Courts were governed by the Act XXVI of 1867. However, within a span of about two years, it was considered necessary to make a general reduction in the rates on the institution of civil suits and to rely on the principle of maximum fee which was obtained under the previous law. Also, in order to rectify the repressive effect and to avoid future confusion between stamp-revenue proper and the revenue derived, a comprehensive bill known as the Court Fees Bill was introduced in the Legislature. Now it is known as the Court Fees Act, 1870. 

The Court Fees Act, 1870 –

The Act extends to the whole of India except the territories comprised in Part B states before the 1st of November, 1956. The Act came into force on 1st April 1970. It contains 6 chapters, 37 sections, and 3 schedules.

Types of Court Fees –

There are two kinds of court fees under the Court Fees Act –

• Ad Valorem Court fees (Schedule 1) – it means according to the valuation. Ad valorem duties are always estimated at a certain percent, on the valuation of the property as opposed to fixed or specific duties.
• Fixed or specific court fees (Schedule 2).

Computation of Court Fees –

Section 7 of the Act contemplates three types of valuation of the subject-matter of a suit.

• By valuing it according to its market value.
• By ascribing to the subject-matter an artificial value based simply on the certain fixed rule of calculation.
• By requiring the plaintiff himself to value the relief he seeks.

This section only applies where the ad valorem fee is payable.

Here is the detailed breakdown of the rule of computation of court fees in these kinds of suits –

• Suits for money – According to the amount claimed.
• Suits of maintenance and annuities or other sums payable periodically – Ten times the amount claimed to be payable in a year.
• Suits for movable property where the subject matter has a market value – According to the market value at the date of presenting the plaint.
• Suits for the possession of land, buildings or gardens – According to market value or (net profit x 15 times), whichever is higher.
• Suits for Pre-emption – If instituted under Muslim Personal Law, then according to the market value of the land.
• Suits for partition – According to the market value of the share in respect of which the suit has been instituted.
• Suits for the interest of an assignee of land revenue – Fifteen times of net profit.
• Suits to set aside an attachment of land – According to the amount for which the land was attached.
• Suits to redeem mortgaged property and suit for foreclosing – According to the principal money
• Suits for injunction or for a right to some benefit to arising out of the land – In such suits, the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought.

Section 35 of the Court Fees Act –

The 1[Appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 2[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act annexed,—The 2[Appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 3[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act annexed,” and may in like manner cancel or vary such order.

The Section states that the appropriate government, whether Central Government or respective State Governments from time to him, has the authority to reduce or remit fees as mentioned in the First and Second Schedules of the Act. It may in like manner also cancel or vary such an order.

CONCLUSION –

The Court Fees Act is a fiscal enactment. Its primary objective is to shield or protect the revenue of the State. It was passed to secure the revenue for the benefit of the State. Court Fee is considered as a State debt. The government has an obligation to pay court fees as much as any other party who approaches the court of law. This act also determines the jurisdiction of civil courts.

It is not mandatory for the court-fee value and the jurisdictional value to be the same. The right procedure is to ascertain the value for court fees at first and then adopt the same valuation for the jurisdiction.

Original blog is published at Legodesk for all your legal quires you could get instant support and help online.

Legodesk makes your legitimate practice increasingly proficient. You can deal with your cases, store significant archives, plan assignments, team up and substantially more to serve your customers.

How Much Do You Know about Rejection Of Plaint Under Civil Procedure Code?

Introduction

The Civil Procedure Code (CPC) deals with the procedure and dealing of the civil suits. Under the CPC nowhere has it been defined that what is ‘rejection of plaint’ but grounds on which a plaint is rejected are mentioned under Order 7 Rule XI. It mentions four grounds on which a plaint can be rejected.

Rejection of plaint- the section specifies the grounds under which the plaint can be rejected:—

(a) where it does not disclose a cause of action;

(b) where the relief claimed is undervalued, and the plaintiff, on being required by the Court to correct the valuation within a time to be fixed by the Court, fails to do so;

(c) where the relief claimed is properly valued, but the plaint is returned upon paper insufficiently stamped, and the plaintiff, on being required by the Court to supply the requisite stamp-paper within a time to be fixed by the Court, fails to do so;

(d) where the suit appears from the statement in the plaint to be barred by any law. [1]

Grounds on which Plaint is Rejected

1. Where it does not disclose the cause of action- if the plaintiff fails to mention the facts which give him right to seek relief against the defendant and the necessary facts that are required to prove wrong done by a defendant against the plaintiff, then in such cases the plaint can be rejected. [2]
2. Where the relief claimed by the plaintiff is undervalued, or fails to correct the same on the direction of the court within a given period.
3. Where plaint is properly valued and relief under it but the plaint gets rejected on the ground of insufficient papers or papers not properly attested or stamped, where the plaintiff does not present the plaint in accordance to the Court-fees Act.
4. Where the suit is time-barred.
5. In every suit, a duplicate file of the plaint needs to be filed by the plaintiff. If this requirement is not fulfilled, the plaint is rejected.
6. Where the plaintiff fails to act in accordance with Rule 7 and Rule 9, the plaint can be rejected.
   

Provision of Rejection of Plaint under the CPC

1. Procedure for rejection of plaint- “for rejection of plaint the judge shall record order with valid reasons for the passing of such order. Recording reasons is very important when the judge rejects any plaint.”[3]

Therefore, an order needs to be recorded by the judge in case of rejection of the plaint. Reasons for such rejection should also be noted by the judge.

2. Where rejection of plaint does not preclude the presentation of fresh plaint— “The rejection of the plaint on any of the grounds hereinbefore mentioned shall not of its force preclude the plaintiff from presenting a fresh plaint in respect of the same cause of action.” [4]

If the plaint is rejected on any of the grounds mentioned under Order 7 Rule XI shall not preclude the plaintiff from presenting a fresh plaint in respect of the same cause of action.

Modes of Rejection of Plaint

1. At any stage of the proceeding, the defendant can file an application which can be in the form of an interlocutory application.
2. Under Order VII Rule 1, Suo Moto rejection can be done. A Suo Moto rejection means that if the conditions above stated are fulfilled, the court can by its own motion try a suit.

Important points to be noted

1. The plaint cannot be partly rejected and partly accepted. It is rejected as a whole. [5]
2. Where an application under Order 7 Rule XI is filled with a mala fide intention to cause delay to the proceeding, it is rejected. [6]
3. The order rejecting a plaint is a decree by a court and hence is appealable. [7]

Conclusion

Civil Procedure Code, 1908 is one of the most important document. It provides a detailed procedure of the civil suits. Comprehensive understanding of each and every provision is an important element. Rejection of plaint is done under certain grounds which are enumerated under Order 7 Rule XI. In the provision, the word ‘shall’ makes it mandatory for the court to reject the plaint when any of the points are satisfied. It is also very essential for the court to record the reasons for any order that it passes in order to reject the plaint. Moreover, if a plaint of the plaintiff is rejected by the court, it doesn’t imply that it cannot bring a suit on the same subject matter again. He is not barred from bringing a subsequent suit on the same subject-matter.

Citation-

[1] Order 7 Rule XI, Civil Procedure Code, 1908.

[2] S.M.P. Shipping Services Pvt. Ltd. V. World Tanker Carrier Corporation (2000) Bom 34.

[3] Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 12.

[4] Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 13.

[5] Kalepur Pala Subrahmanyam v. Tiguti Venkata. (1971) AP 313.

[6] Sopan Sukhdeo Sable V. Asstt. Charity Commr. (2004) SC 569.

[7] Bibhas Mohan Mukherjee v. Hari Charan Banerjee (1961) Cal 491 (FB).