Powers of police under Code of Criminal Procedure

Powers of Police are very wide and are based on two main functions of Police. These functions are Maintaining of Law and Order and Investigation of illegal activities. The Police Act defines Police as an instrument for prevention and detection of Crime.[i] The Police define most of its powers from the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Police Act, 1861. Following are some of the Powers of Police;

Powers of Police to Investigate

The Investigation of Police starts when;

• When someone lodges an FIR(First Information Report).[ii]
• When a Police officer suspects commission of a cognizable offense.[iii]
• Whenever a competent magistrate orders the Police.[iv]

The Police have the power to investigate Cognizable as well as Non-Cognizable offenses.[v] Police officers can investigate Cognizable offenses without the magistrate’s orders. If a Police officer suspects the commission of a cognizable offense, he has the power to investigate under s 157 without the filing of FIR.[vi] Police also have the power to require the presence of witnesses in order to pursue an investigation. Males under 15 years and over 60 years of age, females, or mentally/physically disabled persons shall not be required to attend as a witness except for their residences.[vii] Police can examine these witnesses as well.[viii] Police also has the power to conduct a medical examination of rape victims.[ix]

Powers of Police to Arrest

Police have the power to arrest the persons as well. The Police can make the arrests for both Cognizable as well as Non-cognizable offenses. For non-cognizable offenses, a Police officer has no authority to arrest a person without warrant. However, a Police officer can arrest a person without a warrant for Cognizable offenses.[x] In case of adequate grounds, the magistrate may extend the period of detention to 15 days. Also, the Police have the power to release the accused in case of lack of evidence.[xi]

Power of Preventive Arrest

The preventive arrest is the detaining of a person who is likely to commit an offense. It is a highly debated topic all over the world. In India, s 107 and s 151 of CrPC give the powers of Police for preventive detention mainly. In case an Executive Magistrate recieves information that a person is likely to commit a breach of peace, he may order him to show cause. The magistrate may also order him to execute a bond to keep peace in such period.[xii] It is the duty of the Police to prevent Cognizable offenses.[xiii] Also, the Police have the power to arrest a person without a warrant or an order from the magistrate in cases they have knowledge that such person is planning to commit a cognizable offense.[xiv]

Though, the Police can only make the arrest if it is the only way to prevent such offense. The idea behind these provisions is to avert the commission of an offense. The constitutional validity of these Sections has always been in controversy. Many persons have filed petitions questioning the validity of the provisions of the preventive arrest.[xv] In a case, certain landowners of MP were protesting after being affected by the Sardar Sarovar Project. Even though they posed no threat to commit cognizable offenses but were still beaten up and arrested. The Court held that this was in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution.[xvi] However, s 151 already mentions the grounds of the arrests. Also, preventive arrest laws are given legal recognition under the Constitution of India.[xvii] So, these provisions cannot be said to be in violation of Articles 21 and 22.[xviii]

Read Also: Everything You Need to Know About Criminal Law In India

Abuse of Powers of Police under Preventive Arrest

There have been many instances when these powers have been misused by the Police as well. This was because of the arbitrary and unjust use of these powers. In a case, the persons arrested under s 107 and 151 were not given a chance to be heard for 6 days. The case was tried without any scrutiny under issue. And, no order was issued under s 111 of the CrPC. The Karnataka HC held that this process was arbitrary and unjust as the Police didn’t follow proper procedure.[xix]

In the case of Ahmed Noormohmed Bhatti v State of Gujarat[xx], it was suggested that the guidelines given for the detainees must be followed in cases of Preventive arrests as well. The Court gave these guidelines in the case of D K Basu v State of West Bengal. The Court also held that a provision is not unreasonable or unconstitutional because of arbitrary exercise of it by the authorities. Proper scrutiny of each case is to be done to determine whether the arrest is unconstitutional or not.

Conclusion

Police is an important part of a healthy society. We always remember Police first when we are in trouble or under a threat. The powers of the Police are invested in them to have a smooth and healthy society. But, they ultimately have a duty to protects the rights and interests of the individuals. Due to this, they must use their powers with the utmost care and caution. The author notes that there are many instances where the Police have misused these provisions and there should be a proper check on these practices.

[i] The Police Act 1861, preamble.

[ii] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 154.

[iii] ibid, s 157(1), 156(1).

[iv] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 156(3).

[v] ibid, s 155, 156.

[vi] State of Maharashtra v Sarangdharsingh Shivdassingh Chavan (2011) 1 SCC 577.

[vii] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 160.

[viii] ibid, s 161.

[ix] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 164A.

[x] ibid, s 2(c), 2(l).

[xi] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 169.

[xii] ibid, s 107.

[xiii] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 149.

[xiv] ibid, s 151.

[xv] ‘Role of Police and its power to Investigate’ (Lawnn, 14 February 2017) <https://lawnn.com/role-police-power-investigate/> accessed 12 December 2018.

[xvi] Medha Patkar v State (2011) 8 SCC 55.

[xvii] Constitution of India 1950, a 22.

[xviii] Ahmed Noormohmed Bhatti v State of Gujarat (1999) SCC (Cri) 1014.

[xix] Sathi Sundaresh v The State PSI of Moodigere 2007 (4) CrLJ 649.

[xx] Supra Note xviii.

Section 415 of the Indian Penal Code

Cheating is that offense which is understood even by a layman. Often people use the term ‘cheating’ whereby they mean something to be deceitful or fraudulent. Cheating is considered as a wrong act when done, even in some of the trivial issues. Section 415 of IPC (India Penal Code), 1860 defines ‘Cheating’ and this article would be discussing the legal definition and legal aspect of the offense of cheating.

Section 415 – Cheating

Cheating is defined under Chapter XVII which deals with ‘Offences against Property‘ under Section 415 as follows-

Cheating.—Whoever, by deceiving any person, fraudulently or dishonestly induces the person so deceived to deliver any proper­ty to any person, or to consent that any person shall retain any property, or intentionally induces the person so deceived to do or omit to do anything which he would not do or omit if he were not so deceived, and which act or omission causes or is likely to cause damage or harm to that person in body, mind, reputation or property, is said to “cheat”.

Explanation.—A dishonest concealment of facts is a deception within the meaning of this section.[1]

From the above-mentioned definition, some of the basic elements of cheating are as follows-

Fraudulently  

The act should either be fraudulent or dishonest to be termed as under the offense of cheating. The term ‘fraudulently’ is defined under Section 25 of the IPC.

“A person is said to do a thing fraudulently if he does that thing with intent to defraud but not otherwise.”[2]

Acting dishonestly

The intention of the wrongdoer in every criminal offense is of great importance. Therefore, in cheating, also the person who commits the offense should act dishonestly. The term ‘dishonesty’ is defined under Section 24 of the IPC.

“Whoever does anything with the intention of causing wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person, is said to do that thing “dishonestly”.[3]

Property

Section 415 comes under Chapter XVII, which makes the offense of Cheating that is committed against property.

Deceive

The accused must deceive the person in such a way that he is induced to deliver any property or gives consent to the accused to retain a property that he posses. Also, it is very important to note down here that the deception should be with a dishonest or fraudulent intention.[4]

All the elements of cheating specified under Section 415 should be connected to each other in order to make an offense of cheating.

As per the Supreme Court very clearly held that the crux of the offense of cheating is the intention of the person who induces the victim of his representation. The nature of the transaction is irrelevant, which would become decisive in discerning whether there was the commission of an offense or not.[5]

The Supreme Court in a case held that in order to convict a person under the offense of cheating there should be the pre-existing fraudulent or dishonest intention of the accused from the beginning whereas in case of breach of contract the dishonest intention is generally not present at the beginning of the agreement. [6]

Punishment of Cheating

Cheating is punishable under section 417, and the punishment for cheating is imprisonment up to 1 year or fine or both. [7]Imprisonment depends upon the cheating and quantum of the act. If the act is grave, imprisonment and fine, both can be awarded. Whereas, when the act committed is not grave imprisonment is generally not imposed.

Difference between Cheating and Fraud

The offense of cheating and fraud are almost similar, and therefore, sometimes there is confusion between the two. It is very important to know the differences between the two.

1. The offense of Cheating is mentioned under section 415-420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, whereas, fraud is mentioned under 421-424 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
2. Usually, cheating is committed to obtaining some advantage from a person. Fraud is committed to gain an advantage by another’s loss.
3. Fraud basically is confined to contract cases, but cheating has a wide ambit.

Conclusion

The offense of Cheating, which is very common, includes two main elements, that is deception and inducement. Sometimes cheating is confused with fraud or other civil or criminal offense, but it differs from all of them in one way or the other. Therefore, the conceptual understanding of the offense of cheating becomes very important. Apart from section 415, another section related to cheating are also important.

[1] Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 415.

[2] Indian Penal Code,1860, s. 25.

[3] Indian Penal Code, 1860, s. 24.

[4] A. Pareed Pillai v State (1973) SC 326.

[5] Rajesh Bajaj v. NCT of Delhi and Ors. (1999) SC 1216.

[6] S.W. Palanitkar V. State of Bihar 2001(10) TMI 1150.

[7] Indian Penal Code, s. 417.

5 Easy Ways To Facilitate All About Corporate Governance In India

WHAT IS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN INDIA?

The Institute of Company Secretaries of India defines corporate governance as follows:

“Corporate Governance is the application of the best management practices, compliance of law in true, letter and spirit of adherence to ethical standards for effective management  and distribution of wealth and discharge of social responsibility for the sustainable development of all stakeholders.”

Corporate Governance refers to an established framework of rules, values, morals, and principles based on which a company is governed. A company is a commercial or industrial enterprise constituting an association of people. The stakeholders of a corporation would include shareholders, employees, suppliers, customers and the whole society in general.

HISTORY OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IN INDIA

The concept of corporate governance emerged in the 1990s after the economy of India opened up to the foreign markets; in the era of Economic Liberalization, Privatization and Globalization. Industry Association Confederation of Indian Industry (CII) publicly introduced the code of Corporate Governance in 1998 that was to be followed by Indian Companies (listed), whether they belonged to the private or public sector including Banks and Financial Institutions.

Committee Recommendations

In 2000, The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) which is the body responsible for market regulation in India introduced Clause 49 in “the Listing Agreement of the Stock Exchanges”. The Clause was added after the recommendations from various committees.

The Birla Committee was set up in 1999. Some of the key Birla Committee recommendations which were adopted by the SEBI:

1. The Board of Directors should have a reasonable combination of Executive and Non-Executive Directors.
2. There should be Audit Committees with at least 3 independent directors. One of them should have knowledge of accounting and finance.
3. The company has to prepare an analysis report covering industry structure, the risks and threats, outlook, and internal control system for external review. Similarly, the Board has to conduct meetings in the gap of four months for the internal review of the Company.

The Department of Company Affairs (DCA) appointed the Naresh Chandra Committee in August 2002 to analyze various corporate governance issues. The recommendations touched on independent auditing and board oversight of management as well as financial and non-financial disclosures. It gave suggestions regarding the grounds of disqualifying auditors, and the compulsory rotation of audit partners.

SEBI set up the Narayana Murthy Committee in 2003 to review Clause 49  and to suggest ways to improve it. The Murthy Committee focused on the responsibilities of the audit committee, codes of conduct and financial disclosures and risk management.

Clause 49

SEBI announced the clause on 29th October 2004 after further recommendations. Clause 49  placed all the Listed Companies with a net worth of Rs 25 crore or more or paid-up capital of 3 crores or more as of 31st March 2003 under the Clause.  The Clause contains eight sections; concerning the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee, Remuneration Committees, Management, Shareholders, Board Procedure, Report on Corporate Governance and Compliance. It was ratified by the SEBI and acquired a mandatory status and was to be complied with by 31st December 2005.

In 2009, The Ministry of Corporate Affairs released a set of voluntary guidelines for corporate governance issues like the independence of the board of directors, mechanisms to protect whistleblowing, the audit committee, and secretarial audits. However, there was a shift to a more voluntary approach instead of the earlier mandatory approach.

Companies Bill (2008-2012)

In order to bring corporate governance in the fold of legislation instead of leaving it under the Listing Agreement, there was an effort to redraft the Companies Act, 1956. The government established an Expert Committee on Company Law on 2nd December 2004 to review the earlier Act. The Companies Act, 2008 was introduced in the Parliament based on the recommendations of the Expert Committee. However, the bill lapsed because of the dissolution of the Fourteenth Session of Lok Sabha. The same bill was introduced as Companies Bill, 2009 in the next session. The bill received many recommendations from the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, as a result, the bill was withdrawn. The Bill met the same fate when it was introduced in the 2011 session.

Companies Act, 2013

After many rounds of redrafting, the Companies Bill was finally signed as Companies Act 2013 on 29th August 2013 by the Parliament. The Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) administers the Act.  Some of the key features of the Companies Act, 2013 are as follows:

1. National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), a tribunal to listen to cases related to Indian companies was introduced.
2.  Companies not engaging in business for consecutive two years can be declared dormant.
3. Companies are required to maintain documents electronically.
4. The Act empowered single entrepreneurs to start a company with limited liability protection as a One Person Company (OPC)
5. The company should have at least one woman director if it is a listed company with its securities listed on any stock exchange and/or if it is a company with a paid-up capital of 100 crores or more and a turnover for 300 crores or more.
6. The company must appoint an independent director, i.e someone who is not a promoter of the company or any of its subsidiaries and is not related to the directors or promoters of the company or any of its subsidiaries.
7. A Company must take an initiative to form a Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Committee and Policy and invest at least 2% of the average net profits of the three preceding financial years.
8.  A search and seizure order can be implemented against any company under investigation without an order form the Magistrate.
9. The Act also proposed to establish a National Financial Reporting Authority (NFRA) to assess the work of auditors and enforce accounting and auditing standards.
   Read Also: The 2018 Amendment to The Companies Act, 2013

PRINCIPLES AND OBJECTIVES OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Corporate Governance tries to uphold a set of ideas and principles which are important for the health of any company as well as society:

All the corporate reforms and recommendations always try to increase transparency between the Corporation and its shareholders, investors and the society at large. It ensures the disclosure of financial information and management decisions especially in relation to the shareholders.

Corporate Governance upholds Independence of the Board of Directors who can make independent decisions for the good of the company as well as the investor. At the same time, it also holds them accountable to its investors.

Corporate Governance allows the Company to self-evaluate their practices in their internal board meetings to rectify their mistakes to avoid regulatory fines. An Independent Board is able to point out any potential dangers in the Company’s Management.

It is a known fact that the companies which follow the code of corporate governance are more successful in increasing premiums attached to their shares. It leads to an increase in the shareholder’s wealth as well as the Company’s positive presence in the market.

WHY IS CORPORATE GOVERNANCE IMPORTANT IN INDIA

There are many factors which make corporate governance a necessary tool for the economic growth of society as a whole.

In today’s era of globalization, a company might have shareholders spread over the whole country or the world. The unorganized nature of the shareholders calls for protecting their interests through a standard legal framework.

Mutual funds, as well as institutional investors (national as well as international), have become the largest shareholders in the present day. This change in the pattern of corporate ownership has also forced the hand of the corporate management to adhere to code to uphold their image.

Read Also: 5 Common Types of Business Disputes That Can Be Easily Avoided

In the eyes of the investors and the public, there is a lack of confidence in corporate regimes because of the ever-growing corporate scams. Some of the biggest names involved are Shara group’s chairman Subrata Roy who failed to pay over 20,000 crores to its more than 30 million small investors.  Diamond Jewellery designer Nirav Modi, who is currently an international fugitive is charged with committing 1.8 billion dollar fraud.

The monetary compensation of the Top Level Corporate Executives has increased a lot. The huge amount of compensation comes out of corporate funds which belong to the shareholders. This makes a code of corporate governance important to contain the indulgence of top-level management. Finally, the desire for companies for recognition in the international market makes the need for corporate governance greater.

Read Also: Know these legal requirements before starting an online business

Corporate Governance is not only a standard for a healthy society but also the very foundation of economic growth by keeping a check on an excess of wealth with a few. The society expects more from the corporate sector and to meet those social expectations, corporate governance is necessary.

Original blog is published at LEGODESK  please read the blog for more content and for legal help

Legodesk is a legal practice management tool using which lawyers can manage their matters, win new clients and do their legal research all in one platform. Legodesk’s unique case management features helps to keep your legal practice organized and accessible everywhere.

The Truth About CPC – Code Of Civil Procedure 1908 Is About To Be Revealed.

Code Of Civil Procedure 1908’s Historical Background

Till 1859, in India, there was no uniform systematized law for the procedures to be followed in Civil Courts. In those past times, under the British standard, there were Crown Courts in Presidency towns and Provincial Courts in Mofussils.

• These Courts in Mofussil regions and Presidency towns were administered by various frameworks of Civil procedure through different guidelines, directions and special acts and those were changed on time to time premise based on conditions and needs.
• In 1859, a uniform civil procedure code was presented by passing the Civil Procedure Code (Act VII of 1859). Be that as it may, this code couldn’t fill the need as this code was not made relevant to the Supreme Courts (Crown Courts under the Royal Charter) and the Sadar Diwani Adalats (Principal Courts under the Judicial Plan by the Governor-General).
• In 1861, the Indian High Courts Act was passed and the Supreme Courts and Sadar Diwani Adalats were abolished. Then the High Courts were set up by supplanting the Supreme Courts at Madras, Bombay, and Calcutta. At that point, the Civil Procedure Code 1859 made relevant to these recently established High Courts.
• The Code of 1859 was altered consistently every once in a while and was supplanted by passing the Civil Procedure Code, 1877. This code of 1877 was revised in 1878 and 1879 and the third civil procedure Code was established in 1882, which supplanted the past code. The Code of Civil Procedure 1882 was additionally revised a few times and eventually the present code of Civil Procedure, 1908 was passed eclipsing the deformities of the Code of 1882.

a) Civil Procedure Court: Meaning and Object

The Law identifying with the practices and system to be followed in the Civil Courts is directed by the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. The word CODE signifies ‘a systematic collection of statutes, a body of laws so arranged as to avoid inconsistency and overlapping‘.

The fundamental object of this civil procedure code is to unite and alter the laws identifying with the technique and practices followed in the Civil Courts in India. All things considered, it was cherished in the preamble of the code that it was instituted to combine and revise the laws identifying with the methodology to be followed in the civil courts having civil jurisdiction in India. The Civil Procedure Code directs each activity in civil courts and the gatherings previously it till the execution of the degree and order.

Read Also: Understanding the Civil Laws in India

The Aim of the Procedural law is to execute the standards of Substantive law. This Code guarantees fair justice by upholding the rights and liabilities.

b) Extent and Application

The Civil Procedure Code was passed in 1908 and came into power from first January 1909. The Code is pertinent to the entire nation with the exception of –
The State of Jammu and Kashmir
The state of Nagaland and the tribal regions

There is additionally a provision that the concerned state governments may make the provisions of this code pertinent to the entire or part of the State of Nagaland or such tribal regions by notification in the official gazette.

This code is pertinent in the scheduled zones of the previous State of Madras (Lakshadweep), the East Godavari, West Godavari and Visakhapatnam agencies (Now in Andhra Pradesh State).

Read Also: Civil Procedure Code,1908 – Overview of the Bare Act

Salient Features

• The Civil Procedure Code made the procedure to be followed in the Civil Courts very basic and compelling. Authorization of rights, liabilities, and commitments of the citizens are managed by this code. To state, as such, the Civil Procedure Code gives the component to the implementation of rights and liabilities.
• The Civil Procedure Code is a general law and won’t influence any laws which are as of now in force. If there should arise an occurrence of any contention with any other laws, the other law will prevail in the Civil Procedure Code. On the off chance that, in the event that the other law is quiet about a specific issue, the Civil Procedure Code will apply.
• The Civil Procedure Code has been amended a few times to address the issues and prerequisites which are dynamic and changing every once in a while. Between 1909 to 1976, the Code has been amended for more than 30 times.

Conclusion

To empower the courts to convey fair-minded and unprejudiced equity, the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 gives straightforward and clear procedures to be trailed by the Civil Courts. If there should be an occurrence of no provisions identifying with some issue or matter, the court won’t most likely decide effectively.

Consequently the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 consolidated the provisions for inherent powers. At the point when there is no enactment, the court, in light of a legitimate concern for equity may exercise the discretionary power by acting past the powers given to them under the Code of Civil Procedure. It is known as the Inherent powers of the Court.

The Code of Civil Procedure is one of the vital parts of procedural laws and it is the one regulating the method to be trailed by the Civil Courts in India. Despite the fact that it might have a few restrictions, however, it is as yet effective, basic, clear and empowers the courts to deliver fair-minded equity and impartial justice.

Original blog is published at Legodesk for all your legal quires you could get instant support and help online.

Legodesk makes your legitimate practice increasingly proficient. You can deal with your cases, store significant archives, plan assignments, team up and substantially more to serve your customers.

7 Things That You Never Expect On History Of The Court Fees Act, 1870

History of the Court Fees Act, 1870 –

The Courts are institutions where the aggrieved go to seek justice. With the establishment of Courts in India, a system evolved for the payment of fees for the adjudication of cases. The rates of stamp fees leviable in courts and offices established beyond the local jurisdiction of the ordinary original civil jurisdiction of the High Courts of Judicature at Fort William in Calcutta, Madras, and Bombay and in proceedings on the appellate jurisdiction of High Courts were governed by the Act XXVI of 1867. However, within a span of about two years, it was considered necessary to make a general reduction in the rates on the institution of civil suits and to rely on the principle of maximum fee which was obtained under the previous law. Also, in order to rectify the repressive effect and to avoid future confusion between stamp-revenue proper and the revenue derived, a comprehensive bill known as the Court Fees Bill was introduced in the Legislature. Now it is known as the Court Fees Act, 1870. 

The Court Fees Act, 1870 –

The Act extends to the whole of India except the territories comprised in Part B states before the 1st of November, 1956. The Act came into force on 1st April 1970. It contains 6 chapters, 37 sections, and 3 schedules.

Types of Court Fees –

There are two kinds of court fees under the Court Fees Act –

• Ad Valorem Court fees (Schedule 1) – it means according to the valuation. Ad valorem duties are always estimated at a certain percent, on the valuation of the property as opposed to fixed or specific duties.
• Fixed or specific court fees (Schedule 2).

Computation of Court Fees –

Section 7 of the Act contemplates three types of valuation of the subject-matter of a suit.

• By valuing it according to its market value.
• By ascribing to the subject-matter an artificial value based simply on the certain fixed rule of calculation.
• By requiring the plaintiff himself to value the relief he seeks.

This section only applies where the ad valorem fee is payable.

Here is the detailed breakdown of the rule of computation of court fees in these kinds of suits –

• Suits for money – According to the amount claimed.
• Suits of maintenance and annuities or other sums payable periodically – Ten times the amount claimed to be payable in a year.
• Suits for movable property where the subject matter has a market value – According to the market value at the date of presenting the plaint.
• Suits for the possession of land, buildings or gardens – According to market value or (net profit x 15 times), whichever is higher.
• Suits for Pre-emption – If instituted under Muslim Personal Law, then according to the market value of the land.
• Suits for partition – According to the market value of the share in respect of which the suit has been instituted.
• Suits for the interest of an assignee of land revenue – Fifteen times of net profit.
• Suits to set aside an attachment of land – According to the amount for which the land was attached.
• Suits to redeem mortgaged property and suit for foreclosing – According to the principal money
• Suits for injunction or for a right to some benefit to arising out of the land – In such suits, the plaintiff shall state the amount at which he values the relief sought.

Section 35 of the Court Fees Act –

The 1[Appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 2[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act annexed,—The 2[Appropriate Government] may, from time to time by notification in the Official Gazette, reduce or remit, in the whole or in any part of 3[the territories under its administration], all or any of the fees mentioned in the First and Second Schedules to this Act annexed,” and may in like manner cancel or vary such order.

The Section states that the appropriate government, whether Central Government or respective State Governments from time to him, has the authority to reduce or remit fees as mentioned in the First and Second Schedules of the Act. It may in like manner also cancel or vary such an order.

CONCLUSION –

The Court Fees Act is a fiscal enactment. Its primary objective is to shield or protect the revenue of the State. It was passed to secure the revenue for the benefit of the State. Court Fee is considered as a State debt. The government has an obligation to pay court fees as much as any other party who approaches the court of law. This act also determines the jurisdiction of civil courts.

It is not mandatory for the court-fee value and the jurisdictional value to be the same. The right procedure is to ascertain the value for court fees at first and then adopt the same valuation for the jurisdiction.

Original blog is published at Legodesk for all your legal quires you could get instant support and help online.

Legodesk makes your legitimate practice increasingly proficient. You can deal with your cases, store significant archives, plan assignments, team up and substantially more to serve your customers.