Section 144 IPC The Code of Criminal Procedure

The Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC ) is the principal enactment on the procedure for administration of substantive criminal law in India. It was established in 1973 and came into power on 1 April 1974.

It gives the machinery to the examination of crime, apprehension of suspected criminals, gathering of evidence, assurance of guilt or innocence of the accused individual and the determination of punishment of the guilty. Furthermore, it additionally deals with open public nuisance, prevention of offences and maintenance of wife, child, and parents.

What is Section 144 IPC

Section 144 of the Criminal Code Procedure states the power to issue an order in dire instances of nuisance or apprehended risk.

As indicated by 141-149 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), the maximum punishment for engaging for taking part in rioting is rigorous imprisonment for 3 years or/and fine. Each individual from an unlawful assembly can be considered responsible for wrongdoing committed by the group. Blocking an officer attempting to disperse an unlawful gathering may pull in further punishment.

In about 1861, Officer Raj-Ratna E.F. Deboo IPS were the creator and draftsman of section 144, which lessened by and large crime in that time in the state of Baroda. He was perceived for his drive and granted a gold medal by the Maharaja Gaekwad of Baroda for setting up Section 144 and lessening by and large crime rate.

The section was imposed for the first time in 1861 by the British Raj, and thereafter turned into a critical instrument to stop every single nationalist protest amid the Indian freedom movement, and its utilization in independent India stays controversial as not much has changed. Usually used to avert freedom of expression by quiet protests or demonstrations, even the law does not utilize the terms, however, it mentions “riot”. Section 144 applies amid mobs and election continuing after the announcement of the election.

144 Section Rules and Conditions

(1) In situations where, in the opinion of a District Magistrate, a Sub-divisional Magistrate or some other Executive Magistrate exceptionally enabled by the State Government for this sake, there is adequate ground for continuing under this section and prompt prevention or speedy remedy is alluring, such Magistrate may, by a written order expressing the material facts of the case and served in the way given by section 134, guide any individual to abstain from a specific act or to take certain order concerning certain property in his ownership or under his management, if such Magistrate thinks about that such course is probably going to prevent, or will in general avert, deterrent, inconvenience or damage to any individual lawfully employed, or threat to human life, health or security, or disturbance of public peacefulness, or an uproar, or an affray.

(2) An order under this section may, in instances of crisis or in situations where the conditions don’t concede to the serving in due time of a notice upon the individual against whom the order is coordinated, be passed ex parte.

(3) An order under this section might be coordinated to a specific individual, or to people dwelling in a specific place or area, or to the general population by and large when frequenting or visiting a specific place or area.

(4) No order under this section will stay in power for over two months from the creation thereof: Provided that, if the State Government thinks so to improve the situation preventing peril to human life, health or security or for keeping an uproar or any affray, it might, by notification, coordinate that an order made by a Magistrate under this section will stay in force for such further period not surpassing a half year from the date on which the order made by the Magistrate would have, yet for such order, lapsed, as it might determine in the said notification.

(5) Any Magistrate may, either on his own or on the use of any individual aggrieved, repeal or alter any order made under this section, by himself or any Magistrate subordinate to him or by his predecessor-in-office.

(6) The State Government may, either on its own or on the use of any individual aggrieved, repeal or change any order made by it under the stipulation to subsection (4).

(7) Where an application under subsection (5) or subsection (6) is received, the Magistrate, or the State Government, by and large, will bear to the applicant an early chance of showing up before him or it, either face to face or by pleader and indicating cause against the order; and if the Magistrate or the State Government, all things considered, rejects the application completely or to a limited extent, he or it will record in writing the reasons behind so doing.

Who enforces Section 144 IPC

The orders for Imposing section 144 have been given to Executive Magistrate when there is a crisis situation.

Limitations enforced when Sec 144 IPC is imposed

• The urgency of the circumstance and the power is to be utilized for keeping up public harmony and peace.
• Private rights might be temporarily superseded when there is a contention between public interest and private rights
• Questions of title to properties or entitlements to rights or disputes of civil nature are not open for adjudication in a procedure under section 144 of Criminal Procedure Code.

How the requests of Sec 144 should be passed?

It must be in written form. Prior to enforcing Section 144, Executive Magistrate needs to guarantee whether there is a need to enforce section 144. For this, he/she have to request material facts.

Duration of Order

• Section 144 would be valid just for a time of two months.
• The state government can expand the validity for two months and maximum up to a half year.
• It can be withdrawn any time of time if the circumstance turns normal.

Section 144 IPC at Kerala

The Pathanamthitta district authority in Kerala has forced Section 144 of the CrPC in Sabarimala and close-by regions ahead of the Chithira Avittom Pooja. The hill shrine in Sabarimala was opened for devotees on November 5 and 6. Prohibitory orders will be set up until November 26.
In the wake of violent protest amid the last monthly pooja, the state police have likewise chosen to increase deployment of forces in Sabarimala area.
Then again, state police keep on taking action against protesters in Pamba and Nilakkal. As per the most recent data, 3,701 individuals have been captured in 543 cases by the police.

At the point when the temple was opened for devotees, at least five ladies attempted to visit the main place of worship. In any case, owing to huge protests at the temple and the police’s failure to give adequate security, the ladies couldn’t enter the shrine.

In conclusion, the article aimed at discovering all the aspects of Section 144 of the CrPC. This Section can be misused at times for political gains and can restrain the freedom of movement of people. Therefore, this section before being imposed should be deliberated upon and if imposed, it should be done with the utmost care and precision.

Powers of police under Code of Criminal Procedure

Powers of Police are very wide and are based on two main functions of Police. These functions are Maintaining of Law and Order and Investigation of illegal activities. The Police Act defines Police as an instrument for prevention and detection of Crime.[i] The Police define most of its powers from the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and the Police Act, 1861. Following are some of the Powers of Police;

Powers of Police to Investigate

The Investigation of Police starts when;

• When someone lodges an FIR(First Information Report).[ii]
• When a Police officer suspects commission of a cognizable offense.[iii]
• Whenever a competent magistrate orders the Police.[iv]

The Police have the power to investigate Cognizable as well as Non-Cognizable offenses.[v] Police officers can investigate Cognizable offenses without the magistrate’s orders. If a Police officer suspects the commission of a cognizable offense, he has the power to investigate under s 157 without the filing of FIR.[vi] Police also have the power to require the presence of witnesses in order to pursue an investigation. Males under 15 years and over 60 years of age, females, or mentally/physically disabled persons shall not be required to attend as a witness except for their residences.[vii] Police can examine these witnesses as well.[viii] Police also has the power to conduct a medical examination of rape victims.[ix]

Powers of Police to Arrest

Police have the power to arrest the persons as well. The Police can make the arrests for both Cognizable as well as Non-cognizable offenses. For non-cognizable offenses, a Police officer has no authority to arrest a person without warrant. However, a Police officer can arrest a person without a warrant for Cognizable offenses.[x] In case of adequate grounds, the magistrate may extend the period of detention to 15 days. Also, the Police have the power to release the accused in case of lack of evidence.[xi]

Power of Preventive Arrest

The preventive arrest is the detaining of a person who is likely to commit an offense. It is a highly debated topic all over the world. In India, s 107 and s 151 of CrPC give the powers of Police for preventive detention mainly. In case an Executive Magistrate recieves information that a person is likely to commit a breach of peace, he may order him to show cause. The magistrate may also order him to execute a bond to keep peace in such period.[xii] It is the duty of the Police to prevent Cognizable offenses.[xiii] Also, the Police have the power to arrest a person without a warrant or an order from the magistrate in cases they have knowledge that such person is planning to commit a cognizable offense.[xiv]

Though, the Police can only make the arrest if it is the only way to prevent such offense. The idea behind these provisions is to avert the commission of an offense. The constitutional validity of these Sections has always been in controversy. Many persons have filed petitions questioning the validity of the provisions of the preventive arrest.[xv] In a case, certain landowners of MP were protesting after being affected by the Sardar Sarovar Project. Even though they posed no threat to commit cognizable offenses but were still beaten up and arrested. The Court held that this was in violation of Article 21 of the Constitution.[xvi] However, s 151 already mentions the grounds of the arrests. Also, preventive arrest laws are given legal recognition under the Constitution of India.[xvii] So, these provisions cannot be said to be in violation of Articles 21 and 22.[xviii]

Read Also: Everything You Need to Know About Criminal Law In India

Abuse of Powers of Police under Preventive Arrest

There have been many instances when these powers have been misused by the Police as well. This was because of the arbitrary and unjust use of these powers. In a case, the persons arrested under s 107 and 151 were not given a chance to be heard for 6 days. The case was tried without any scrutiny under issue. And, no order was issued under s 111 of the CrPC. The Karnataka HC held that this process was arbitrary and unjust as the Police didn’t follow proper procedure.[xix]

In the case of Ahmed Noormohmed Bhatti v State of Gujarat[xx], it was suggested that the guidelines given for the detainees must be followed in cases of Preventive arrests as well. The Court gave these guidelines in the case of D K Basu v State of West Bengal. The Court also held that a provision is not unreasonable or unconstitutional because of arbitrary exercise of it by the authorities. Proper scrutiny of each case is to be done to determine whether the arrest is unconstitutional or not.

Conclusion

Police is an important part of a healthy society. We always remember Police first when we are in trouble or under a threat. The powers of the Police are invested in them to have a smooth and healthy society. But, they ultimately have a duty to protects the rights and interests of the individuals. Due to this, they must use their powers with the utmost care and caution. The author notes that there are many instances where the Police have misused these provisions and there should be a proper check on these practices.

[i] The Police Act 1861, preamble.

[ii] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 154.

[iii] ibid, s 157(1), 156(1).

[iv] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 156(3).

[v] ibid, s 155, 156.

[vi] State of Maharashtra v Sarangdharsingh Shivdassingh Chavan (2011) 1 SCC 577.

[vii] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 160.

[viii] ibid, s 161.

[ix] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 164A.

[x] ibid, s 2(c), 2(l).

[xi] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 169.

[xii] ibid, s 107.

[xiii] Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, s 149.

[xiv] ibid, s 151.

[xv] ‘Role of Police and its power to Investigate’ (Lawnn, 14 February 2017) <https://lawnn.com/role-police-power-investigate/> accessed 12 December 2018.

[xvi] Medha Patkar v State (2011) 8 SCC 55.

[xvii] Constitution of India 1950, a 22.

[xviii] Ahmed Noormohmed Bhatti v State of Gujarat (1999) SCC (Cri) 1014.

[xix] Sathi Sundaresh v The State PSI of Moodigere 2007 (4) CrLJ 649.

[xx] Supra Note xviii.

Procedure after FIR is lodged and FIR cancellation procedure

Introduction

The first information report is a written report prepared by the police department of the respective police station where the crime  (Cognizable offense) has occurred. This is an essential practice which gives a kickstart to a criminal proceeding in a court. It is prevalent in countries like India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, etc. An FIR is generally logged by the victim of a cognizable offense. However, in the cases where the victim is deceased or is in such a condition as unable to lodge an FIR, someone on his behalf can also lodge an FIR either orally or in writing to the police. FIR is defined under Section 154 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973.   As the name itself suggests, An Fir must contain all the information which the victim is possessing about the cognizable offense. Also, Fir must be read to the person giving information or lodging complaint to the police and must contain his signature. This prevents cases of fraud FIRs lodged by the police officials if the complainant is illiterate.

After lodging an FIR

Once the FIR is lodged, the police can start the investigation work. The investigation includes collecting evidence, questioning witnesses, inspecting the crime scene, forensic testing, recording statements of the witnesses. It is always said that, after experiencing a cognizable offense, the first thing a victim should do, is to lodge an FIR. The reason for the same is attributed to the fact that, if there will be a considerable amount of time duration between the commission of a crime and lodging an FIR, this will give an opportunity to the offender to manipulate the shreds of evidence, eye-witness or any such material which can turn the judgment of the bench. For example, in rape cases, certain medical tests are to be conducted within a span of 2 days. Otherwise, there will be no evidence left in the victim’s body.

Once the stage of investigation is completed, the police may form a Charge Sheet often called as Challan and record their findings in it. If it is deemed that there is enough proof in the charge sheet, the case reaches the court.

Also, if after the completion of the investigation, the police concludes that there is not enough evidence, so as to establish the crime, they may close the case. Reason for closing the case must be backed by a rational in the competent court of jurisdiction.

When authorities refuse to lodge an FIR

Remember, that no police station can deny for lodging an FIR and they have to do this free of cost.

1. You can contact Superintendent of Police or any other high officials and bring to their notice the complaint filed by you.
2. You can contact such high officials by sending the complaint to them in writing. If they are satisfied by your complaint, they may order for the investigation of the case of may investigate the case himself.
3. A private complaint can be lodged in the court of competent jurisdiction.
4. You approach the authorities such as the State Human Rights Commission or the National Human Rights Commission.

Filing a Criminal Complaint accompanied by Vakalatnama and Court Fees

This is a petition which is submitted by the complainant authorizing an advocate to plead the case. This contains written allegations of the complainant, the summary of the happening of offense and the complaint prays for the relief he seeks for the same.

Criminal Complaint must be accompanied by a Vakalatnama. It gives the advocate (Who will be representing you in the court) the authorization to fight for justice, appear on his behalf, and handle all the court procedure. The lawyer who has signed the Vakalatnama is bonded by all the duties of an advocate, such as Attorney-Client Privilege. All such terms and conditions are explicitly mentioned in Vakalatnama.

Plaints are also required to be accompanied by court fees to be paid to the court. The amount of court fees is governed by the rules an regulations embodied in the Court Fees Stamp Act. Court fees are usually a nominal percentage to the suit value, and it differs from case to case.

Cancellation of FIR

Once the Fir is registered, FIR cannot be canceled. Even when the complainants urge for the same. It can be disposed of only as per the manner prescribed under the Criminal Procedure Code.

FIR is disposed of in the following circumstances-

1. When the Offender cannot be traced even after making all possible efforts, and there are no changes for finding him in the future.
2. When the Complainant has registered a false complaint.
3. The accused person dies before filing the charge sheet against him in the court.
4. When the complaint withdraws the case or requests the court to refer the case to Lok Adalat/ National Lok Adalat. So that the case can have a lead towards settlement.

In addition to the aforementioned circumstances, the government has the power to withdraw prosecution of a criminal case against him in the court. This power is conferred under Section 321 of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Conclusion

All citizens should get to know about their rights to filing FIRs. At the same time, they must be aware of the steps that they can take if the police refuse to register their complaints. In some cases, it is best to file a complaint petition before the judicial magistrate instead of registering an FIR.