Punishment for Rape – An offence under the Indian Penal Code

The term “rape” is defined under Section 375 of the Indian Penal Code. Under Indian law, only a man can be held liable for the offense of rape. A man is said to commit rape if he has sexual intercourse with a woman under any of the six following conditions –

• Against the will of the woman;
• Without the consent of the woman;
• With her consent, when her consent was obtained by putting her or any person in whom she is interested by fear or of death or hurt;
• With her consent, when the man is aware that he is not her husband and that her consent has been given because she believes that he is another man to whom she believes herself to be law­fully married;
• With her consent, when, at the time of giving such consent, due to unsoundness of mind or intoxication or the administration by him personally or through another of any stupe­fying or unwholesome substance, she is unable to understand the nature and consequences of the consent she gives;
• With or without her consent, when she is below sixteen years of age.

The explanation to the Section says that penetration is sufficient to constitute the offense of rape.

The exception to the Section says that Sexual intercourse by a man on his own wife, with the wife being not below fifteen years of age is not rape, within the meaning of the Section.

Punishment for Rape –

The minimum punishment for rape shall be imprisonment of either a description for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend for the entire life or for a term which may extend to ten years and shall also be liable to fine, unless the woman raped in question, is the own wife of the man.

In case, the woman is the wife of the perpetrator, and she is under twelve years of age, in that case, he shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which can extend to two years or with fine or both.

Rape of a woman who is under twelve years of age – [Section 376(2)(f)]

The punishment for this includes a term which shall not be less than ten years, which may extend for life, and the perpetrator shall also be liable to pay a fine.

Rape of a woman, knowing that she is pregnant – [Section 376(2)(e)]

The punishment for this includes a term which shall not be less than ten years but which may extend for life and the perpetrator shall also be liable to pay a fine.

Gang rape – [Section 376(2)(g)]

The definition of Gang rape is included in the Explanation under Section 376(2)(g). Gang rape means “Where a woman is raped by one or more in a group of persons acting in furtherance of their common intention, each of the persons shall be deemed to have committed gang rape within the meaning of this subsection.” 

It means that even if six people force a woman into having sexual intercourse with only one of them, yet the remaining five will also be considered to have committed rape under Section 376(2)(g).

Punishment for the rape of this nature includes imprisonment term which shall not be less than ten years but which may be for life and the perpetrator shall also be liable to pay a fine.

Custodial Rape – [Section 376(2)a,b,c and d]

This includes rape on a woman in their or their subordinate’s custody by –

• A police officer within the limits of the police station to which he is appointed, or in the premises of any station house whether or not situated in the police station to which he is appointed; or on a woman in his custody or in custody of a police officer in a subordinate position to him.
• A public servant
• Management or the staff of a jail, remand home, or some other place of custody or a women’s or children’s institution.
• Management or the staff of a hospital.

CONCLUSION

Rape is one of the most heinous offenses in India. It is an offense which has brought so much agitation from all corners of India and from almost segments of the society. However, the Indian Penal Code is a colonial law. It was drafted way back in the 1860s, and hence, most of it seems redundant in the world of feminist evolution. The catch about Section 375 is that only a man can commit rape, and only a woman can be the victim under the same. Hence, the offense of rape on a man by a man or a woman does come within the ambit of this section. Rape laws have also been made stringent by the Criminal Laws (Amendment) Ordinance, 2018, which provides for Death Penalty for the rape of women below twelve years of age. Plus, the minimum punishment for rape was increased from seven years to ten years and rape of girls below sixteen years is now punishable with imprisonment up to twenty years or life imprisonment

Learn The Truth About Domestic Violence Act- An Overview In The Next 60 Seconds.

The position of women in Indian society has never been stable. Their journey started from enjoying equal rights in the ancient period to struggle against discrimination in the medieval time and fighting for their rights in the modern era.

Women have been facing abuses since long back. They have not only suffered emotionally, mentally, verbally, religiously but also physically. This all often takes a wrong turn and women end up suffering from marital rape, dowry death, suicide, acid attacks, beating, female genital mutation, etc.

According to former Union Minister for Women, Renuka Chowdhary 70% of women in India are the victims of Domestic Violence.[1]

These practices became so prevalent and entrenched that the Government of India took a step forward and implemented an Act on 13 September 2005 for the protection of women from all kind of violence. The Act came to be known as The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

Domestic Violence – Definition

The word ‘domestic violence’ has been defined in Section 3 of the PWDVA, 2005. The definition has a significant amplitude and covers all types of abuses against women. It covers physical, sexual, verbal and emotional, and economic abuse.

The sections read as follows-

For this Act, any act, omission or commission or conduct of the respondent shall constitute domestic violence in case it—

1. harms or injures or endangers the health, safety, life, limb or well‑being, whether mental or physical, of the aggrieved person or tends to do so and includes causing physical abuse, sexual abuse, verbal and emotional abuse, and economic abuse; or
2. harasses, harms, injures or endangers the aggrieved person to coerce her or any other person related to her to meet any unlawful demand for any dowry or other property or valuable security; or
3. has the effect of threatening the aggrieved person or any person related to her by any conduct mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b); or
4. Otherwise, injuries or causes harm, whether physical or mental, to the aggrieved person.[2]

The framework of the definition has been taken from ‘UN Declaration on Violence Against Women and a Model Code’.

Read More Here: Domestic Violence Act

Who can file a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act?

Any ‘aggrieved person’ as per Section 2(a) of the Act can seek relief.

“Aggrieved person” means any woman who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the respondent and who alleges to have been subjected to any act of domestic violence by the respondent.[3]

• It is very clear from the definition that only a female victim can be an ‘aggrieved person’.
• The victim should have a ‘domestic relationship’ with the respondent. According to Section 2(f), the domestic relationship includes a relationship by means of living together or sharing household and is related to each other by consanguinity, marriage, relationships in nature of marriage, adoption, etc.

The victims of Live-in Relationships are also protected under the Act. This right has been recognized in various judgments like Khusboo v. Kannimal[4]; Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Khushwaha[5].

Against whom the complaint can be filed?

Section 2(q) defines ‘respondent’ as follows:

“Respondent” means any adult male person who is, or has been, in a domestic relationship with the aggrieved person and against whom the aggrieved person has sought any relief under this Act: Provided that an aggrieved wife or female living in a relationship in the nature of a marriage may also file a complaint against a relative of the husband or the male partner;

Therefore, from the above definition, it is very clear that the victim can file a suit against her husband who commits such act against her or any other male partner with whom she is in a live-in or the relatives of the husband/male partner, i.e. the in-laws.

Who may or may not be included in the ambit of relatives is of utmost importance and differs from case to case.

This was upheld in Sandhya Wankhede v. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhede[6].

Relief that can be sought by the victim under the Act

The Act recognizes many reliefs to empower a woman to tide over an emergency.

If the victim obtains relief under this law that does not mean she is barred from approaching courts under the personal law. The PWDVA is a secular law and runs parallel to personal laws.

The Act provides the following reliefs-

• Counseling (Sec. 14)

The magistrate before whom the parties are presented may direct either the parties or the party who requires to the counseling process.

• Protection Orders (Section 18)

The magistrate can issue protecting order against the respondent. This is generally done to keep the victim in a protective shell so that the respondent doesn’t reach out to her for causing violence.

A  Protection Officer, preferably a woman, is appointed by the concerned government to file a domestic incidence report.

• Residence ( Sec. 19)

The Magistrate can restrict the respondent from the place of the victim. Further, the respondent cannot evict the victim from the place of the residence.

• Maintenance (Sec. 20)

Under Section 20, the respondent may be directed to provide monetary compensation to the victim for any loss she has accrued, be it property loss, medical loss or any other financial loss.

• Child’s Custody (Sec. 21)

The custody of the child should be in the victim’s hand. The father of the child may be provided visiting rights.

Retrospective effect of the Act

The Delhi HC in its 2012 decision of V.D.  Bhanot v. Savita Bhanot [7]viewed that “even a wife who had shared household before the DV Act came into force would also be entitled to the protection of this Act”.

Therefore, giving the aggrieved party the right to file a suit even for the acts which have been committed before the enforcement of the Act.

Citation

[1] ‘India tackles domestic violence’ (BBC News, 26 October 2006) <http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/6086334.stm> accessed 3 February 2019

[2] The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, s 3

[3] The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act 2005, s 2(a)

[4] Khusboo v. Kannimal (2010) 5 SCC 600.

[5] Chanmuniya v. Virendra Kumar Singh Khushwaha 1 SCC 141.

[6] Sandhya Wankhede v. Manoj Bhimrao Wankhede (2011) 3 SCC 650.

[7] V.D. Bhanot v. Savita Banot(2012) 3 SCC 183